Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — FX-4100 outperforms the more expensive FX-6200 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing FX-4100 is 138 days older than the more expensive FX-6200.
Advantages of AMD FX-4100
- Up to 52% cheaper than FX-6200 - €20.59 vs €42.6
- Up to 53% better value when playing F1 23 than FX-6200 - €0.14 vs €0.3 per FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than AMD FX-6200 - 95 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of AMD FX-6200
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4100 - 6 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-4100 doesn't have integrated graphics
F1 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for €20.59 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 52 minutes ago
Buy for €42.6 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 52 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
AMD FX-4100 | vs | AMD FX-6200 |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Feb 27th, 2012 |
FX | Collection | FX |
Zambezi | Codename | Zambezi |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 3 |
4 | Threads | 6 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |