Key Differences
In short — Celeron G1820 outperforms the cheaper FX-4100 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G1820 is 781 days newer than the cheaper FX-4100.
Advantages of AMD FX-4100
- Up to 46% cheaper than Celeron G1820 - €19.39 vs €35.91
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1820 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1820
- Performs up to 0% better in World of Tanks than FX-4100 - 505 vs 503 FPS
- Consumes up to 44% less energy than AMD FX-4100 - 53 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-4100 doesn't have integrated graphics
World of Tanks
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €19.39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 375 minutes ago
Buy for €35.91 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 375 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-4100 | vs | Intel Celeron G1820 |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Dec 1st, 2013 |
FX | Collection | Celeron |
Zambezi | Codename | Haswell |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
95 W | TDP | 53 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
Yes | Overclockable | No |