Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Megaport outperforms the more expensive M2A Starship Mini on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of Megaport Gaming PC
- Performs up to 6% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than M2A Starship Mini - 147 vs 139 FPS
- Up to 24% cheaper than M2A Starship Mini - €1299.0 vs €1699.0
- Up to 28% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than M2A Starship Mini - €8.84 vs €12.22 per FPS
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
FPS
139
94.5578231292517%
Value, €/FPS
€12.22/FPS
72.34042553191489%
Price, €
€1699
76%
Buy for €1,699 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 53161 minutes ago
32nd Variation
FPS
147
100%
Value, €/FPS
€8.84/FPS
100%
Price, €
€1299
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €1,299 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 53161 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
32nd Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
GeForce RTX 3080
10 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
164.2 GPixel/s
82.92929292929291%
Texel Fillrate
465.1 GTexel/s
83.8924963924964%
32nd Variation
GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER
12 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
198 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
554.4 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
32nd Variation
Ryzen 7 5700X
null-core
Single-Core
2121
85.7662757784068%
Multi-Core
9729
74.58601655933764%
M2A Starship Mini Gaming PC | vs | Megaport Gaming PC |
---|---|---|
Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
Core i9-12900 | CPU | Ryzen 7 5700X |
GeForce RTX 3080 | GPU | GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER |
32 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
1 TB SSD | Storage | N/A Storage |