Key Differences
In short — Xeon W3565 outperforms FX-6100 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon W3565 is 710 days older than FX-6100.
Advantages of Intel Xeon W3565
- Performs up to 1% better in Battlefield IV than FX-6100 - 372 vs 367 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6100 - 8 vs 6 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-6100
- Consumes up to 27% less energy than Intel Xeon W3565 - 95 vs 130 Watts
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
FPS
367
98%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.27/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$98.43
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$98.43 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 101 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Nov 1st, 2009
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon W3565 | vs | AMD FX-6100 |
---|---|---|
Nov 1st, 2009 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
Xeon | Collection | FX |
Bloomfield | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 6 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 95 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 16.5x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |