Buy on Amazon
CA$98.43
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Xeon W3530 outperforms FX-6100 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon W3530 is 575 days older than FX-6100.
Advantages of Intel Xeon W3530
- Performs up to 0% better in World of Tanks than FX-6100 - 504 vs 502 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6100 - 8 vs 6 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-6100
- Consumes up to 27% less energy than Intel Xeon W3530 - 95 vs 130 Watts
World of Tanks
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
FX-6100
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
FPS
502
99%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.2/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$98.43
100%
Value Winner
AMD FX-Series FX-6100 FX6100 Desktop CPU Socket AM3 938 FD6100WMW6KGU FD6100WMGUSBX
Buy for CA$98.43 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 171 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon W3530
Server/Workstation • Mar 16th, 2010
FX-6100
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon W3530 | vs | AMD FX-6100 |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 16th, 2010 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
| Xeon | Collection | FX |
| Bloomfield | Codename | Zambezi |
| Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 6 |
| 2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
| 3.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| 130 W | TDP | 95 W |
| 45 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 16.5x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
