Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2643 outperforms FX-6100 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2643 is 146 days newer than FX-6100.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2643
- Performs up to 1% better in Stray than FX-6100 - 177 vs 175 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6100 - 8 vs 6 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-6100
- Consumes up to 27% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2643 - 95 vs 130 Watts
Stray
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
FPS
175
98%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.56/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$98.43
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$98.43 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 96 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2643 | vs | AMD FX-6100 |
---|---|---|
Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | FX |
Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 6 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 95 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 16.5x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |