Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1900X outperforms Xeon E5-2420 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is 1935 days newer than Xeon E5-2420.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2420
- Consumes up to 47% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 95 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Performs up to 183% better in League of Legends than Xeon E5-2420 - 153 vs 54 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2420 - 16 vs 12 threads
League of Legends
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
153
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.31/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$200.16
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$200.16 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 73 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Server/Workstation • May 14th, 2012
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2420 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
---|---|---|
May 14th, 2012 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2017 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Sandy Bridge-EN | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1356 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
12 | Threads | 16 |
1.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
2.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 180 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |