Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13400F outperforms Xeon E5-1620 v4 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-13400F is 2389 days newer than Xeon E5-1620 v4.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13400F
- Performs up to 38% better in Starfield than Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 73 vs 53 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 16 vs 8 threads
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
73
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$24.85/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$1814.02
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$1,814.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 55063 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Single-Core
1088
47.51091703056768%
Multi-Core
3898
36.27733829688227%
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 | vs | Intel Core i5-13400F |
---|---|---|
Jun 20th, 2016 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Broadwell-E/EP | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
140 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |