Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 3970X outperforms Xeon E5-1620 v4 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 3970X is 1253 days newer than Xeon E5-1620 v4.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4
- Consumes up to 50% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X - 140 vs 280 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
- Performs up to 4% better in The Last of Us Part I than Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 137 vs 132 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 64 vs 8 threads
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
FPS
137
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$16.06/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$2200
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$2,200 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 55061 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Single-Core
1088
66.50366748166259%
Multi-Core
3898
27.826956025128496%
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X |
---|---|---|
Jun 20th, 2016 | Release Date | Nov 25th, 2019 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Broadwell-E/EP | Codename | Castle Peak |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket TRX4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 32 |
8 | Threads | 64 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 280 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |