Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX outperforms Xeon E5-1620 v4 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX is 1485 days newer than Xeon E5-1620 v4.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4
- Consumes up to 50% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX - 140 vs 280 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX
- Performs up to 15% better in Cyberpunk 2077 than Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 82 vs 71 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 32 vs 8 threads
Cyberpunk 2077
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
RT Overdrive
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
FPS
82
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$21.95/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$1800
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$1,800 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 55044 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
RT Overdrive
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Single-Core
1088
64.9164677804296%
Multi-Core
3898
31.55508783291508%
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX |
---|---|---|
Jun 20th, 2016 | Release Date | Jul 14th, 2020 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Broadwell-E/EP | Codename | Castle Peak |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket WRX8 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 280 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |