Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10920X outperforms Xeon E5-1620 v4 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10920X is 1216 days newer than Xeon E5-1620 v4.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than Intel Core i9-10920X - 140 vs 165 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10920X
- Performs up to 9% better in Battlefield V than Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 249 vs 229 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 24 vs 8 threads
Battlefield V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
FPS
249
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$4.7/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$1170.48
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$1,170.48 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5303 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 | vs | Intel Core i9-10920X |
---|---|---|
Jun 20th, 2016 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2019 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i9 Extreme |
Broadwell-E/EP | Codename | Cascade Lake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 12 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 165 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |