Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10920X outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 2920X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen Threadripper 2920X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10920X is 381 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 2920X.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10920X
- Performs up to 3% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 209 vs 202 FPS
- Consumes up to 8% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 165 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Up to 17% cheaper than Core i9-10920X - CA$1005.22 vs CA$1218.33
- Up to 15% better value when playing Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Core i9-10920X - CA$4.98 vs CA$5.83 per FPS
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
FPS
209
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$5.83/FPS
85%
Price, CA$
CA$1218.33
82%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$1,218.33 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 170 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
FPS
202
96%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$4.98/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$1005.22
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$1,005.22 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 170 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-10920X | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2019 | Release Date | Oct 3rd, 2018 |
Core i9 Extreme | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Cascade Lake | Codename | Colfax |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 12 |
24 | Threads | 24 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
165 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |