Buy on Amazon
CA$1,791.28
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $294
Availability
MSRP in USD: $294
No items available
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $1299
Availability
MSRP in USD: $1299
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX outperforms Xeon E5-1620 v4 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX is 834 days newer than Xeon E5-1620 v4.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4
- Consumes up to 44% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX - 140 vs 250 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX
- Performs up to 1% better in Baldur's Gate 3 than Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 115 vs 114 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 48 vs 8 threads
Baldur's Gate 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX
Desktop • Oct 2nd, 2018
FPS
115
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$15.58/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$1791.28
100%
FPS and Value Winner
AMD YD297XAZAFWOF Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX 24 Core, 48 Thread Processor, Pack of 1
Buy for CA$1,791.28 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 56222 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E5-1620 v4
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX
Desktop • Oct 2nd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5-1620 v4
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Single-Core
1088
88.09716599190284%
Multi-Core
3898
52.62589442419333%
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 20th, 2016 | Release Date | Oct 2nd, 2018 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
| Broadwell-E/EP | Codename | Colfax |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 24 |
| 8 | Threads | 48 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
| 3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 250 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
