Key Differences
In short — Xeon E3-1285L v4 outperforms FX-8350 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E3-1285L v4 is 952 days newer than FX-8350.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1285L v4
- Performs up to 1% better in Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands than FX-8350 - 190 vs 189 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-8350 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
189
99%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.97/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$182.45
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$182.45 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 47 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Jun 2nd, 2015
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1285L v4 | vs | AMD FX-8350 |
---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2015 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | FX |
Broadwell | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
Intel Iris Pro P6300 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |