Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-6500 outperforms the more expensive FX-8350 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-6500 is 982 days newer than the more expensive FX-8350.
Advantages of AMD FX-8350
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-6500 - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-6500
- Performs up to 5% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than FX-8350 - 157 vs 149 FPS
- Up to 35% cheaper than FX-8350 - CA$118.88 vs CA$182.45
- Up to 38% better value when playing Red Dead Redemption 2 than FX-8350 - CA$0.76 vs CA$1.22 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-8350 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for CA$182.45 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4815 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
FPS
157
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.76/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$118.88
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$118.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4816 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8350 | vs | Intel Core i5-6500 |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jul 2nd, 2015 |
FX | Collection | Core i5 |
Vishera | Codename | Skylake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | HD Graphics 530 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |