Key Differences
In short — Xeon E3-1285L v4 outperforms Ryzen 5 2600 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E3-1285L v4 is 1052 days older than Ryzen 5 2600.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1285L v4
- Performs up to 3% better in Rust than Ryzen 5 2600 - 190 vs 184 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 2600 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2600
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1285L v4 - 12 vs 8 threads
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
184
96%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.58/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$290
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$290 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18805 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Server/Workstation • Jun 2nd, 2015
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1285L v4 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 2600 |
---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2015 | Release Date | Apr 19th, 2018 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Broadwell | Codename | Pinnacle Ridge |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel Iris Pro P6300 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |