Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 5900X outperforms Xeon E3-1285L v4 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 5900X is 1983 days newer than Xeon E3-1285L v4.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1285L v4
- Consumes up to 38% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 5900X - 65 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 9 5900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 5900X
- Performs up to 28% better in Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than Xeon E3-1285L v4 - 258 vs 201 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1285L v4 - 24 vs 8 threads
Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
FPS
258
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.47/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$379.95
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$379.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 149 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Server/Workstation • Jun 2nd, 2015
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1285L v4 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 5900X |
---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2015 | Release Date | Nov 5th, 2020 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Broadwell | Codename | Vermeer |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 12 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 105 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel Iris Pro P6300 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |