Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1920X outperforms Xeon E3-1280 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1920X is 2321 days newer than Xeon E3-1280.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1280
- Consumes up to 47% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 95 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Performs up to 9% better in Need For Speed Unbound than Xeon E3-1280 - 137 vs 126 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1280 - 24 vs 8 threads
Need For Speed Unbound
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
137
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.79/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$382.62
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$382.62 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Apr 3rd, 2011
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1280 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2011 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 12 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 180 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |