Key Differences
In short — Xeon E3-1225 v5 outperforms Ryzen Threadripper 1900X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E3-1225 v5 is 682 days older than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1225 v5
- Performs up to 0% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 202 vs 201 FPS
- Consumes up to 56% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 80 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1225 v5 - 16 vs 4 threads
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
201
99%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$200.98
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$200.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 133 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Server/Workstation • Oct 19th, 2015
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1225 v5 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2015 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2017 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Skylake | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
HD Graphics P530 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |