Buy on Amazon
CA$82.49
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $450
Availability
MSRP in USD: $450
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Xeon E-2276M outperforms FX-6100 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E-2276M is 2786 days newer than FX-6100.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E-2276M
- Performs up to 7% better in The Last of Us Part I than FX-6100 - 136 vs 127 FPS
- Consumes up to 53% less energy than AMD FX-6100 - 45 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6100 - 12 vs 6 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6100 doesn't have integrated graphics
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
FX-6100
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
FPS
127
93%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.65/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$82.49
100%
Value Winner
AMD FX-Series FX-6100 FX6100 Desktop CPU Socket AM3 938 FD6100WMW6KGU FD6100WMGUSBX
Buy for CA$82.49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15798 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E-2276M
Server/Workstation • May 29th, 2019
FX-6100
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E-2276M | vs | AMD FX-6100 |
|---|---|---|
May 29th, 2019 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
| Xeon E | Collection | FX |
| Coffee Lake | Codename | Zambezi |
| Intel BGA 1440 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 6 | Cores | 6 |
12 | Threads | 6 |
| 2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 16.5x |
UHD Graphics P630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
