Buy on Amazon
CA$111.14
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $87
Availability
MSRP in USD: $87
No items available
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $169
Availability
MSRP in USD: $169
Key Differences
In short — FX-8320 outperforms Pentium G6950 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing FX-8320 is 1020 days newer than Pentium G6950.
Advantages of Intel Pentium G6950
- Consumes up to 42% less energy than AMD FX-8320 - 73 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8320 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8320
- Performs up to 9% better in The Callisto Protocol than Pentium G6950 - 72 vs 66 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G6950 - 8 vs 2 threads
The Callisto Protocol
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
AMD FX-Series FX-8320 CPU Used 8-Core 8-Thread Desktop Processor 3.5 GHz 8M 125W Socket AM3+
Buy for CA$111.14 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 138 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Pentium G6950
Desktop • Jan 7th, 2010
FX-8320
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Pentium G6950
Desktop • Jan 7th, 2010
Single-Core
324
70.58823529411765%
Multi-Core
517
28.42221000549753%
Intel Pentium G6950 | vs | AMD FX-8320 |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 7th, 2010 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
| Pentium | Collection | FX |
| Clarkdale | Codename | Vishera |
| Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 8 |
| 2 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
73 W | TDP | 125 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 17.5x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
