Key Differences
In short — FX-4350 outperforms Pentium G6950 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing FX-4350 is 1208 days newer than Pentium G6950.
Advantages of Intel Pentium G6950
- Consumes up to 42% less energy than AMD FX-4350 - 73 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-4350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-4350
- Performs up to 2% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Pentium G6950 - 168 vs 165 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G6950 - 4 vs 2 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
FPS
168
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.72/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$120.26
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$120.26 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 82 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 7th, 2010
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 7th, 2010
Single-Core
324
69.08315565031982%
Multi-Core
517
42.51644736842105%
Intel Pentium G6950 | vs | AMD FX-4350 |
---|---|---|
Jan 7th, 2010 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2013 |
Pentium | Collection | FX |
Clarkdale | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
73 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 19.5x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |