Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900F outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900F is 2682 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900F
- Performs up to 13% better in Dead Space than Celeron G3900 - 164 vs 145 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 32 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 88% cheaper than Core i9-13900F - CA$67.21 vs CA$564.18
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-13900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for CA$564.18 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 106 minutes ago
Buy for CA$67.21 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 106 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Single-Core
581
21.28205128205128%
Multi-Core
992
5.761077879087055%
Intel Core i9-13900F | vs | Intel Celeron G3900 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Core i9 | Collection | Celeron |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 2 |
32 | Threads | 2 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
5.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
Not Available | TDP | 51 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
No | Overclockable | No |