Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900F outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1840 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1840 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900F is 3170 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1840.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900F
- Performs up to 29% better in FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker than Celeron G1840 - 291 vs 225 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1840 - 32 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1840
- Up to 93% cheaper than Core i9-13900F - CA$41.21 vs CA$564.18
- Up to 91% better value when playing FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker than Core i9-13900F - CA$0.18 vs CA$1.94 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-13900F doesn't have integrated graphics
FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
291
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.94/FPS
9.278350515463918%
Price, CA$
CA$564.18
7%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$564.18 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5015 minutes ago
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
225
77.31958762886599%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.18/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$41.21
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$41.21 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5007 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-13900F | vs | Intel Celeron G1840 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | May 1st, 2014 |
Core i9 | Collection | Celeron |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 2 |
32 | Threads | 2 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
5.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
Not Available | TDP | 53 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
No | Overclockable | No |