Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 3900XT outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1840 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 3900XT is 2259 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1840.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1840
- Up to 93% cheaper than Ryzen 9 3900XT - CA$41.21 vs CA$588.07
- Consumes up to 50% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT - 53 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT
- Performs up to 14% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Celeron G1840 - 193 vs 169 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1840 - 24 vs 2 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for CA$41.21 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 331 minutes ago
Buy for CA$588.07 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 331 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Single-Core
505
29.207634470792364%
Multi-Core
854
8.51445663010967%
Intel Celeron G1840 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT |
---|---|---|
May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2020 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Haswell | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 12 |
2 | Threads | 24 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
53 W | TDP | 105 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |