Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 3900XT outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 2920X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 3900XT is 643 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 2920X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT
- Performs up to 34% better in Marvel’s Spider-Man Remastered than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 130 vs 97 FPS
- Consumes up to 42% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 105 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Up to 6% cheaper than Ryzen 9 3900XT - CA$552.98 vs CA$590.73
Marvel’s Spider-Man Remastered
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for CA$590.73 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 395 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
FPS
97
74.61538461538461%
Value, CA$/FPS
Price, CA$
CA$552.98
100%
Buy for CA$552.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 396 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2020
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Single-Core
1274
73.68421052631578%
Multi-Core
7454
74.31704885343969%
AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X |
---|---|---|
Jul 7th, 2020 | Release Date | Oct 3rd, 2018 |
Ryzen 9 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Matisse | Codename | Colfax |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 12 |
24 | Threads | 24 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
105 W | TDP | 180 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |