Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 3900XT outperforms the cheaper Core i7-10700F on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 3900XT is 68 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-10700F.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT
- Performs up to 12% better in Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than Core i7-10700F - 242 vs 216 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-10700F - 24 vs 16 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700F
- Up to 37% cheaper than Ryzen 9 3900XT - CA$375.13 vs CA$600.0
- Consumes up to 38% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT - 65 vs 105 Watts
Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for CA$600 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 64035 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
216
89.25619834710744%
Value, CA$/FPS
Price, CA$
CA$375.13
100%
Buy for CA$375.13 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 64036 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2020
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Single-Core
1612
93.23308270676691%
Multi-Core
7231
72.09371884346959%
AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT | vs | Intel Core i7-10700F |
---|---|---|
Jul 7th, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Ryzen 9 | Collection | Core i7 |
Matisse | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 8 |
24 | Threads | 16 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
105 W | TDP | 65 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |