Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900 outperforms Celeron G1620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900 is 3684 days newer than Celeron G1620.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900
- Performs up to 33% better in No Man's Sky than Celeron G1620 - 207 vs 156 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1620 - 32 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1620
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900 - 55 vs 65 Watts
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for CA$32.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 297 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
409
15.070007369196759%
Multi-Core
723
4.401558504809448%
Intel Core i9-13900 | vs | Intel Celeron G1620 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
Core i9 | Collection | Celeron |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 2 |
32 | Threads | 2 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
5.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 55 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
No | Overclockable | No |