Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900 outperforms Core i3-4160 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900 is 3089 days newer than Core i3-4160.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900
- Performs up to 26% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i3-4160 - 157 vs 125 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4160 - 32 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4160
- Consumes up to 17% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900 - 54 vs 65 Watts
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Buy for CA$36.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 305 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Single-Core
1064
39.20412675018423%
Multi-Core
2072
12.614148301473275%
Intel Core i9-13900 | vs | Intel Core i3-4160 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Jul 21st, 2014 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i3 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 2 |
32 | Threads | 4 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
5.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 54 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4400 |
No | Overclockable | No |