Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900K outperforms the cheaper FX-6100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-12900K is 3676 days newer than the cheaper FX-6100.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900K
- Performs up to 8% better in Dishonored 2 than FX-6100 - 274 vs 254 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6100 - 24 vs 6 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6100 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-6100
- Up to 80% cheaper than Core i9-12900K - CA$82.49 vs CA$409.0
- Up to 79% better value when playing Dishonored 2 than Core i9-12900K - CA$0.32 vs CA$1.49 per FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than Intel Core i9-12900K - 95 vs 125 Watts
Dishonored 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
274
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.49/FPS
21%
Price, CA$
CA$409
20%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$409 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10129 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
FPS
254
92%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.32/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$82.49
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$82.49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10129 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-12900K | vs | AMD FX-6100 |
---|---|---|
Nov 4th, 2021 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
Core i9 | Collection | FX |
Alder Lake | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 6 |
24 | Threads | 6 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 95 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 16.5x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |