Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-2300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-2300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-11900F is 3719 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-2300.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900F
- Performs up to 12% better in Rocket League than Core i5-2300 - 758 vs 675 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i5-2300 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-2300 - 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-2300
- Up to 90% cheaper than Core i9-11900F - CA$44.35 vs CA$438.62
- Up to 88% better value when playing Rocket League than Core i9-11900F - CA$0.07 vs CA$0.58 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-11900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Rocket League
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
758
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.58/FPS
12%
Price, CA$
CA$438.62
10%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$438.62 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 48 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
FPS
675
89%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.07/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$44.35
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$44.35 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 48 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-11900F | vs | Intel Core i5-2300 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Jan 9th, 2011 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i5 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2000 |
No | Overclockable | No |