Buy on Amazon
CA$44.35
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $449
Availability
MSRP in USD: $449
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 5800X3D outperforms the cheaper Core i5-2300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-2300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 7 5800X3D is 4119 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-2300.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-2300
- Up to 89% cheaper than Ryzen 7 5800X3D - CA$44.35 vs CA$408.98
- Up to 86% better value when playing Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Ryzen 7 5800X3D - CA$0.41 vs CA$2.86 per FPS
- Consumes up to 10% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D - 95 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D
- Performs up to 31% better in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Core i5-2300 - 143 vs 109 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-2300 - 16 vs 4 threads
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Core i5-2300
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
FPS
109
76%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.41/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$44.35
100%
Value Winner
Intel Core i5-2300 CPU Used 4-Core 4-Thread Desktop Processor 2.8 GHz 6M 95W LGA1155
Buy for CA$44.35 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 158 minutes ago
Ryzen 7 5800X3D
Desktop • Apr 20th, 2022
FPS
143
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.86/FPS
14%
Price, CA$
CA$408.98
10%
FPS Winner
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8-core, 16-Thread Desktop Processor with AMD 3D V-Cache Technology
Buy for CA$408.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 159 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Core i5-2300
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Ryzen 7 5800X3D
Desktop • Apr 20th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-2300 | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 9th, 2011 | Release Date | Apr 20th, 2022 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
| Sandy Bridge | Codename | Vermeer |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 8 |
| 4 | Threads | 16 |
| 2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 105 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
| 28.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD 2000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
