Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7900 outperforms the cheaper Core i5-2300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-2300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 7900 is 4388 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-2300.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-2300
- Up to 91% cheaper than Ryzen 9 7900 - CA$44.35 vs CA$489.0
- Up to 65% better value when playing Immortals of Aveum than Ryzen 9 7900 - CA$1.77 vs CA$5.04 per FPS
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 7900
- Performs up to 288% better in Immortals of Aveum than Core i5-2300 - 97 vs 25 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i5-2300 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-2300 - 24 vs 4 threads
Immortals of Aveum
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
FPS
25
25%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.77/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$44.35
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$44.35 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 102 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 14th, 2023
FPS
97
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$5.04/FPS
35%
Price, CA$
CA$489
9%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$489 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 102 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Desktop • Jan 14th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-2300 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 7900 |
---|---|---|
Jan 9th, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 14th, 2023 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 12 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.4 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD 2000 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |