Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700K outperforms the cheaper Core i5-2300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-2300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-10700K is 3399 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-2300.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-2300
- Up to 87% cheaper than Core i7-10700K - CA$44.35 vs CA$330.0
- Up to 81% better value when playing Starfield than Core i7-10700K - CA$0.99 vs CA$5.24 per FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than Intel Core i7-10700K - 95 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700K
- Performs up to 40% better in Starfield than Core i5-2300 - 63 vs 45 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-2300 - 16 vs 4 threads
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
FPS
45
71%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.99/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$44.35
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$44.35 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10302 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
63
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$5.24/FPS
18%
Price, CA$
CA$330
13%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$330 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10302 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-2300 | vs | Intel Core i7-10700K |
---|---|---|
Jan 9th, 2011 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Intel HD 2000 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |