Buy on Amazon
CA$499
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $799
Availability
MSRP in USD: $799
Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900KF outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1920X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen Threadripper 1920X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900KF is 994 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1920X.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900KF
- Performs up to 16% better in Dirt 5 than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 198 vs 170 FPS
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 125 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Up to 26% cheaper than Core i9-10900KF - CA$369.9 vs CA$499.0
- Up to 13% better value when playing Dirt 5 than Core i9-10900KF - CA$2.18 vs CA$2.52 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-10900KF - 24 vs 20 threads
Dirt 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Core i9-10900KF
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
198
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.52/FPS
86%
Price, CA$
CA$499
74%
FPS Winner
Intel Core i9-10900KF (Base Stroke: 3.70GHz; Socket: LGA1200; 125 watt) Box
Buy for CA$499 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 170 minutes ago
Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
170
85%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.18/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$369.9
100%
Value Winner
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X (12-core/24-thread) Desktop Processor (YD192XA8AEWOF)
Buy for CA$369.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 171 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Core i9-10900KF
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-10900KF | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X |
|---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
| Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
| Comet Lake | Codename | Whitehaven |
| Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 10 | Cores | 12 |
| 20 | Threads | 24 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
5.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 180 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
