Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900KF outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 3 3300X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900KF is 6 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 3 3300X.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900KF
- Performs up to 1% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Ryzen 3 3300X - 113 vs 112 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 3300X - 20 vs 8 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3300X
- Up to 34% cheaper than Core i9-10900KF - CA$265.0 vs CA$400.0
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900KF - 65 vs 125 Watts
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for CA$400 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 79 minutes ago
Buy for CA$265 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 79 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Apr 24th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 24th, 2020
Single-Core
1670
94.72490073737947%
Multi-Core
5793
63.28381035612847%
Intel Core i9-10900KF | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 3300X |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 24th, 2020 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 4 |
20 | Threads | 8 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
5.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |