Buy on Amazon
CA$639.99
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-10300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-10300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900F and the cheaper Core i3-10300 have been released at the same time.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10300 - 20 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10300
- Up to 78% cheaper than Core i9-10900F - CA$139.99 vs CA$639.99
- Up to 78% better value when playing Stray than Core i9-10900F - CA$0.76 vs CA$3.46 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Stray
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Core i9-10900F
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
185
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$3.46/FPS
21.965317919075144%
Price, CA$
CA$639.99
21%
Intel Core i9-10900F Desktop Processor 10 Cores up to 5.2 GHz Without Processor Graphics LGA 1200 (Intel 400 Series chipset) 65W
Buy for CA$639.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3668 minutes ago
Core i3-10300
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
185
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.76/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$139.99
100%
Value Winner
Intel® Core™ i3-10300 Desktop Processor 4 Cores up to 4.4 GHz LGA1200 (Intel® 400 Series chipset) 65W
Buy for CA$139.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3668 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Core i9-10900F
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Core i3-10300
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-10300
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Single-Core
1565
93.37708830548927%
Multi-Core
4795
56.90719202468549%
Intel Core i9-10900F | vs | Intel Core i3-10300 |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| Core i9 | Collection | Core i3 |
| Comet Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
| Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 4 |
20 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
| 65 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 28.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
