Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 3800XT outperforms the cheaper Core i9-10900F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i9-10900F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 7 3800XT is 68 days newer than the cheaper Core i9-10900F.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Up to 33% cheaper than Ryzen 7 3800XT - CA$388.0 vs CA$575.0
- Up to 31% better value when playing F1 23 than Ryzen 7 3800XT - CA$1.62 vs CA$2.34 per FPS
- Consumes up to 38% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT - 65 vs 105 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT
- Performs up to 2% better in F1 23 than Core i9-10900F - 246 vs 240 FPS
F1 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
240
97%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.62/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$388
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$388 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 157 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2020
FPS
246
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.34/FPS
69%
Price, CA$
CA$575
67%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$575 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 157 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-10900F | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2020 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 8 |
20 | Threads | 16 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 105 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |