Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900F outperforms the cheaper Core i9-10900F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i9-10900F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-12900F is 614 days newer than the cheaper Core i9-10900F.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Up to 51% cheaper than Core i9-12900F - CA$388.0 vs CA$792.34
- Up to 47% better value when playing Elden Ring than Core i9-12900F - CA$3.13 vs CA$5.91 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900F
- Performs up to 8% better in Elden Ring than Core i9-10900F - 134 vs 124 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-10900F - 24 vs 20 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
124
92%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$3.13/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$388
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$388 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 157 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
134
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$5.91/FPS
52%
Price, CA$
CA$792.34
48%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$792.34 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 156 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-10900F | vs | Intel Core i9-12900F |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i9 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 16 |
20 | Threads | 24 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
65 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |