Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-10300 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900F is 979 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-10300.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10300
- Up to 75% cheaper than Core i9-13900F - CA$139.99 vs CA$564.18
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-13900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900F
- Performs up to 16% better in Alan Wake 2 than Core i3-10300 - 134 vs 116 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10300 - 32 vs 8 threads
Alan Wake 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for CA$139.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76002 minutes ago
Buy for CA$564.18 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76002 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Single-Core
1565
57.32600732600732%
Multi-Core
4795
27.847145594982287%
Intel Core i3-10300 | vs | Intel Core i9-13900F |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 24 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
65 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |