Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-10300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-10300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-12900F is 614 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-10300.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10300
- Up to 77% cheaper than Core i9-12900F - CA$139.99 vs CA$618.44
- Up to 73% better value when playing Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Core i9-12900F - CA$1.07 vs CA$4.02 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-12900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900F
- Performs up to 18% better in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Core i3-10300 - 154 vs 131 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10300 - 24 vs 8 threads
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
131
85.06493506493507%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.07/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$139.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$139.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 32 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
154
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$4.02/FPS
26.61691542288558%
Price, CA$
CA$618.44
22%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$618.44 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 34 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Single-Core
1565
61.63844033083892%
Multi-Core
4795
34.52123830093593%
Intel Core i3-10300 | vs | Intel Core i9-12900F |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
65 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |