Key Differences
In short — Core i7-9700F outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1900X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-9700F is 600 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1900X.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-9700F
- Performs up to 3% better in Halo Infinite than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 162 vs 158 FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 65 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Up to 33% cheaper than Core i7-9700F - CA$200.16 vs CA$299.99
- Up to 31% better value when playing Halo Infinite than Core i7-9700F - CA$1.27 vs CA$1.85 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-9700F - 16 vs 8 threads
Halo Infinite
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
162
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.85/FPS
68%
Price, CA$
CA$299.99
66%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$299.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 130 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
158
97%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.27/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$200.16
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$200.16 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 131 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-9700F | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
---|---|---|
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2017 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |