Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2920X outperforms the cheaper Core i7-880 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-880 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2920X is 3048 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-880.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-880
- Up to 74% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - CA$153.98 vs CA$600.58
- Up to 74% better value when playing Dead Space than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - CA$1.06 vs CA$4.0 per FPS
- Consumes up to 47% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 95 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Performs up to 3% better in Dead Space than Core i7-880 - 150 vs 145 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-880 - 24 vs 8 threads
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 30th, 2010
FPS
145
96.66666666666667%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.06/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$153.98
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$153.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2304 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
FPS
150
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$4/FPS
26.5%
Price, CA$
CA$600.58
25%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$600.58 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2310 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 30th, 2010
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • May 30th, 2010
Single-Core
520
40.816326530612244%
Multi-Core
1653
22.17601287899115%
Intel Core i7-880 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X |
---|---|---|
May 30th, 2010 | Release Date | Oct 3rd, 2018 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Lynnfield | Codename | Colfax |
Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 12 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 180 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |