Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-12900KF outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2920X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-12900KF is 1128 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2920X.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900KF
- Performs up to 5% better in F1 22 than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 288 vs 273 FPS
- Up to 58% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - CA$405.68 vs CA$970.66
- Up to 60% better value when playing F1 22 than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - CA$1.41 vs CA$3.56 per FPS
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 125 vs 180 Watts
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
FPS
273
94%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$3.56/FPS
39%
Price, CA$
CA$970.66
41%
Buy for CA$970.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 57 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
288
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.41/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$405.68
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$405.68 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 56 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X | vs | Intel Core i9-12900KF |
---|---|---|
Oct 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Nov 4th, 2021 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i9 |
Colfax | Codename | Alder Lake |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 16 |
24 | Threads | 24 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 125 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |