Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11500 outperforms the cheaper Core i7-875K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-875K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11500 is 3943 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-875K.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-875K
- Up to 60% cheaper than Core i5-11500 - CA$112.0 vs CA$283.02
- Up to 27% better value when playing Counter-Strike 2 than Core i5-11500 - CA$0.46 vs CA$0.63 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11500
- Performs up to 84% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Core i7-875K - 446 vs 243 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i7-875K - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-875K - 12 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-875K doesn't have integrated graphics
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • May 30th, 2010
FPS
243
54%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.46/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$112
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$112 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18825 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
446
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.63/FPS
73%
Price, CA$
CA$283.02
39%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$283.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18825 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • May 30th, 2010
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-875K | vs | Intel Core i5-11500 |
---|---|---|
May 30th, 2010 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i5 |
Lynnfield | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
22.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 750 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |