Key Differences
In short — Core i7-820QM outperforms Core i7-875K on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-820QM is 249 days older than Core i7-875K.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-820QM
- Consumes up to 53% less energy than Intel Core i7-875K - 45 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-875K doesn't have integrated graphics
Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 30th, 2010
FPS
189
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.59/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$112
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$112 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 212 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Sep 23rd, 2009
Desktop • May 30th, 2010
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-820QM | vs | Intel Core i7-875K |
---|---|---|
Sep 23rd, 2009 | Release Date | May 30th, 2010 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i7 |
Clarksfield | Codename | Lynnfield |
Intel Socket G1 | Socket | Intel Socket 1156 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
1.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
3.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 95 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 45 nm |
13.0x | Multiplier | 22.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |