Key Differences
In short — Celeron G6900 outperforms Core i7-820QM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G6900 is 4486 days newer than Core i7-820QM.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-820QM
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Performs up to 18% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i7-820QM - 135 vs 114 FPS
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
135
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.84/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$112.98
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$112.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 184 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Mobile • Sep 23rd, 2009
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-820QM | vs | Intel Celeron G6900 |
---|---|---|
Sep 23rd, 2009 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Core i7 | Collection | Celeron |
Clarksfield | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket G1 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
1.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
45 W | TDP | Not Available |
45 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
13.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 710 |
No | Overclockable | No |