Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2920X outperforms the cheaper Core i7-6900K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-6900K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2920X is 855 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-6900K.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6900K
- Up to 66% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - CA$248.88 vs CA$726.1
- Up to 65% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - CA$1.41 vs CA$4.06 per FPS
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 140 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Performs up to 2% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Core i7-6900K - 179 vs 176 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-6900K - 24 vs 16 threads
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
FPS
176
98%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.41/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$248.88
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$248.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
FPS
179
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$4.06/FPS
34%
Price, CA$
CA$726.1
34%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$726.1 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-6900K | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X |
---|---|---|
May 31st, 2016 | Release Date | Oct 3rd, 2018 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Broadwell-E | Codename | Colfax |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 12 |
16 | Threads | 24 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |