Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900F outperforms the cheaper Core i7-6900K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-6900K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900F is 2409 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-6900K.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6900K
- Up to 31% cheaper than Core i9-13900F - CA$389.99 vs CA$564.18
- Up to 15% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i9-13900F - CA$3.05 vs CA$3.57 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900F
- Performs up to 23% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i7-6900K - 158 vs 128 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-6900K - 32 vs 16 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
FPS
128
81.0126582278481%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$3.05/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$389.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$389.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 58296 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
158
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$3.57/FPS
85.43417366946778%
Price, CA$
CA$564.18
69%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$564.18 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 58295 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Single-Core
1252
45.86080586080586%
Multi-Core
7118
41.338056797723446%
Intel Core i7-6900K | vs | Intel Core i9-13900F |
---|---|---|
May 31st, 2016 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Broadwell-E | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 24 |
16 | Threads | 32 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
140 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |