Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-7920X outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2920X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-7920X is 388 days older than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2920X.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-7920X
- Performs up to 6% better in Immortals of Aveum than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 51 vs 48 FPS
- Up to 48% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - CA$600.75 vs CA$1163.52
- Up to 51% better value when playing Immortals of Aveum than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - CA$11.78 vs CA$24.24 per FPS
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 140 vs 180 Watts
Immortals of Aveum
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
FPS
48
94%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$24.24/FPS
48%
Price, CA$
CA$1163.52
51%
Buy for CA$1,163.52 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11581 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2017
FPS
51
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$11.78/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$600.75
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$600.75 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11580 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X | vs | Intel Core i9-7920X |
---|---|---|
Oct 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Sep 10th, 2017 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i9 |
Colfax | Codename | Skylake |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 12 |
24 | Threads | 24 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 140 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |